From datasheet PDF to reviewable symbol and footprint.
Circuitly reads the datasheet and your library conventions, then generates the part as native library files your librarian approves — instead of an engineer transcribing pin tables.
Use cases
Circuitly reviews schematics and layout in full context, creates library parts from datasheets, keeps the approved library consistent, designs bounded circuit blocks, and watches the BOM — each with the inputs, engineering output, and human decision point defined.
Connected review
A Circuitly review spans schematic and layout together, and runs against everything the change touches: the firmware that drives the pins, the requirements the rail must hold, MCAD outline and keep-outs, the datasheets, the revision history, and your own engineering standards. Findings arrive with evidence attached — and wait for an engineer to approve them.
Four more capabilities
Review is where most teams start. The library, the BOM, and the bounded design block run through the same connected context and the same rule: Circuitly prepares the work, an engineer approves it.
Circuitly reads the datasheet and your library conventions, then generates the part as native library files your librarian approves — instead of an engineer transcribing pin tables.
Duplicates, footprint drift, stale datasheets, and post-approval EOL surface as an audit with proposed fixes — and the library owner decides what changes.
Delegate the bounded, mid-complexity block — grounded in your library and the datasheets, with assumptions written down — and keep the architecture yours.
The BOM is monitored between revisions, and every candidate substitution is scored against the circuit it serves, trade-offs stated, for an engineer to approve.
Scenario library
Each scenario defines the inputs, the engineering output, and the human decision point — so you can pick the first workflow by value, context, and risk.
Review and understand
Understand architecture, inspect requirements coverage, surface potential issues, and resolve open questions.
Open use caseReconstruct design intent and dependencies before changing an inherited or under-documented design.
Open use caseCompare delivered work against requirements, standards, interfaces, and the agreed design boundary.
Open use caseReview, connected
Review each diff and release candidate with full context before it ships.
Open use caseKnow which requirements the design satisfies — and which nobody has covered.
Open use caseCatch EOL parts, stock cliffs, and single-source exposure during review.
Open use caseYour Markdown checklists and standards, applied on every review.
Open use caseShare and prepare
Prepare architecture, interfaces, known constraints, decisions, and open questions for layout, firmware, sourcing, manufacturing, or a new owner.
Open use caseGive a new contributor a grounded path through the design instead of a folder dump and tribal knowledge.
Open use caseResolve layout-sensitive assumptions, constraints, interfaces, and missing context before they become board rework.
Open use caseTranslate the design record into expected rails, interfaces, test points, sequencing, and investigation paths.
Open use caseWe’ll help identify a bounded use case where your team can learn quickly without weakening engineering control.
Talk to us about your AI strategy